Attention: Abundant Activities has begun!
1 2
1 year ago
PrioritizePronouns Over Sex in Wolf Bios

A simple suggestion to have the provided or chosen pronouns be more prominent on a wolf's bio page than their assigned sex. While it's nice to be able to choose masculine, feminine, neutral, or customized pronouns per wolf, it displays only as small text beneath their name on the left. Their assigned sex however remains on the right very plainly. While I understand the intent in making breeding seem based in a sense of realism by pairing male and female sexes, it does ultimately undermine the feeling of being able to choose pronouns in my opinion.

My suggestion is to have the pronouns either be more “eye-catching” in some way, such as being larger or taking one of the site's accent colors (ie, green, white/black depending on theme) instead of being grey. Alternatively and/or at the same time, it would be nice to be able to make the wolf's assigned sex less boldly apparent especially when poses per sex already exist for breeding purposes- you see a thumbnail of the wolves in question rather than a male-female list. My other idea would be to simply title it “Assigned Sex” or even “Pose” to be even less strict about it and move chosen pronouns to the right infobox as “Gender” or “Pronouns” right above or below sex.

Maybe it's a non-issue for many players, but in the spirit of being inclusive it would definitely make me feel more comfortable making or including transgender characters if their birth sex wasn't stated so openly despite choosing pronouns for them. It also opens up the door for people who want to interpret a character or wolf of theirs as male or female, or even simply feel that one of the poses suits their character better, but their on-site wolf is the “wrong” sex. This would allow them to designate a character as a “lore male” or cisgender man using the alt pose without also having a big indicator on the right that says “Female”, which may be needlessly confusing when introducing the character to others for RP or story purposes.

I know I'm just a new player but it was something that stood out to me as a small thing that could be easily settled one way or the other while the site is still small. I appreciate all opinions on the matter : )

Report
{ Lorwolf Time -7 }
Casual wolf enjoyer
1 year ago

Definite support, this has admittedly bothered me a tiny bit so it would be nice to have changed! I like all the solutions you've offered, especially the idea of changing it to be called 'Pose' instead, since that's the most accurate one from a gameplay perspective - although maybe that could be a tiny bit confusing for newer players who might not realize that also affects breeding, but I don't know. In any case I also definitely would like the pronouns to be added to the Details box as well, although I like their current placement too so I think it'd be fine if they were just in both places! :]

Report
Quote
1 year ago
Heemi
They/them
3
3 Achievements
Forum Rank 1
Forum Threads: 20
Forum Comments: 183

Support!! This has been bothering me for a quite a bit, especially since a lot of my characters are Trans, and the language used is kind of invalidating.

Unfortunately, I don't really know of a better solution while keeping things PG than the one suggested above, which is why I wholeheartedly endorse said solution!


EDIT: Literally just thought of something. Why not call the Poses “Sire Pose” and “Carrier Pose” instead of Male/Female? They're much less inherently gendered.

…Though if someone can come up with a better noun than “Carrier” for someone who gets pregnant, please tell me, and suggest that instead, LOL!

(Edited)
Report
Quote


Consistently Indecisive.

1 year ago

@Heemi

sire/dam would be the word pairing based on IRL breeding and likely the clearest for players coming from other sites/players who have not considered this detail before.

i think i am neutral on the suggestion overall since this could very easily confuse new players who don't understand the nuances of the site's setup and i think confusion surrounding a baseline feature of a game is ultimately worse for site health than confusion in RP/lore interactions, as someone who's been ignoring whatever indicator the site gives in favor of poses forever—but if it was done in a way that left the breeding mechanics clear for those players i'd be fine with it.

just please not “carrier” pose LMAO frankly that's about 100x worse for my dysphoria than seeing a little symbol on a pet page

Report
Quote
1 year ago

Honestly I'd love a section for gender, separate from sex. Maybe replace the sex text with “can get pregnant/can get others pregnant”?

Report
Quote
1 year ago
Heemi
They/them
3
3 Achievements
Forum Rank 1
Forum Threads: 20
Forum Comments: 183

@Aenocyon

I'm so sorry if I caused you dysphoria!!

…I honestly thought Dam would be worse for Dysphoria since it's very. Uh. Feminine sounding?

For context, I'm Trans/Nonbinary, and I get icky feelings at the idea of being called “Dam” as an AFAB person IRL. I just wanted to avoid the word because of that, and I wasn't considering anyone else's experiences on the matter mostly because I'm still half asleep

I hope you can forgive my stupidity…

Report
Quote


Consistently Indecisive.

1 year ago

@Heemi

no, no worries! i was thinking more in terms of seeing it as a site feature (aka constantly) not just in your suggestion, so you're good :)

to me sire/dam are more neutral since that's an accepted standard term with animals, which these are… but our differing perspectives are also a good reason why its not as straightforward as it might seem to make an adjustment like this! i am also not western so my interpretation of english words can differ, for yet another fun obstacle…

another thing i realized while typing this is the sex indicator is far less prominent on dark mode since it's black on dark grey, so perhaps if it's possible to alter this based on site skin, a light grey version for light mode might help make pronouns stand out more as well?

Report
Quote
1 year ago

Just noticed something else too, slightly different to the original suggestion but still related - on the den/player profile pages there are also male/female symbols for all the wolves, next to their name, but their pronouns aren't shown at all. I think having the symbols is fine, but I'd also propose adding their pronouns there, in the same way as the level is shown on the den page (but visible on both the den page and the player profile). Rough mockups:

Also, to add onto some of the other discussion - maybe on the wolf page, sex could be replaced with Gender, which could be customizable (or at least partly, maybe choosing from a list with options for male, female, nonbinary and maybe a few more), with maybe either the text Sire/Dam in brackets, or a male/female symbol like on the den page, after the gender? Here are some rough mockups for both ideas (ignore that the pronouns have different capitalization, couldn't decide which I preferred shdhsdhsdh):

Now the wolf I used for all these mockups isn't trans so it doesn't really show exactly how that would actually look whoops, but hopefully it still makes enough sense haha!

(Edited)
Report
Quote
1 year ago

@siltfern

i really like those mockups, actually! sticking to the male/female symbol in the details might be better if that's used elsewhere—it's not perfect re:inclusiveness i guess, but i think keeping that sort of thing unified in display will make it easiest for players to use.

Report
Quote
1 year ago

@Aenocyon

Glad you like my little mockups, haha! c: And yeah, I agree that having the symbol is definitely not quite perfect but I think it's small enough that it wouldn't bother me too much to have on my trans wolves, and it's a bit neater than having (sire)/(dam) there - plus it helps with consistency, as you said, so it'd probably be my preferred solution, personally! :]

Report
Quote
1 year ago

This is something I thought of before that I think could work, but I'm not sure there's much a more elegant solution to this that doesn't run the risk of compromising gameplay elements or confusing other parts of the player base.

I had this in mind thinking on this issue as an agender person myself who doesn't generally deal with too much dysphoria on the day to day with issues like this, so apologies if I don't really grasp the issue as much as I should/come off as insensitive in any way, it's definitely not my intention ;;

Siltfern beat me to mockups, but I was also thinking of expanding that to profile displays and shrinking the symbols a bit entirely. While it's not a perfect solution, I feel like the symbols would be good to keep for gameplay elements, while transgender symbols could get very confusing and also be not inclusive of nonbinary people if only the mtf/ftm symbols were implemented.

Allowing players to pick a sex/symbol display or optionally displaying the neuter symbol both seem like they'd make a mess of mechanics and just create a lot of confusion for people who might not be aware of the symbols themselves. Allowing all wolves to breed together regardless of sex mechanics alternatively seems like it would end up very unbalancing as well.

(Edited)
Report
Quote

LW-7 ☆ 28 ☆ your local neighborhood trash pigeon ☆ I make pixel & digital art and CA sometimes.
Art ShopCA ShopCASP

1 2
Unsubscribe from Post
Subscribe to Thread
Recent
Subscribed
My posts
Subscribed
You are not subscribed to any threads.
My Threads
You do not have any threads.
Trees
Music
Shuffle
Theme
Enable to have Music selection based site activities.
Repeat
Enable to repeat the current song.
Volume
Dismiss
Not interested in music? Permanently dismiss this music player.
Bathing on an Arturas
Boil 'em, Mash 'em
Canictonis Crossing
Dreaming About You
Embarking
Fields of Loria
First Snow
Follow the Leader
Good Morning, Challengers
Haunted Cave
Head in the Clouds
Into the Deep
Lone Wolf
Moonsblessings
Mosey Through the Forums
Nothing but Time
Play Date With Nana
Queueing Up
Silly Walk
Sleepy Wolves
Sploosh
Sunken Melody
The Mighty Remain
Through Goldsea
What to Buy?